About Jon Stewart …

In the big scheme of things what Jon Stewart says about me or what I say about him doesn’t amount to much.  It doesn’t really amount to much in the small scheme of things, either.  But this is the United States of Entertainment, after all, so here goes.

The other night Jon Stewart played a few clips of Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and me, condemning the Left for tarring Tea Party protestors as a bunch of racists, because of what a few people might or might not have said at a rally in Washington.

Stewart said he agreed with us.  Generalizing like that, he said, was wrong.  Then he fired the heavy artillery.  He ran a montage of Fox News commentators making broad generalizations about liberals, including one of me saying that Democrats and liberals think people who live in the middle of the country are a bunch of jerks.

Get it?  We’re condemning generalizations then what do we do?  We generalize about liberals, proving that we’re nothing more than a bunch of right-wing hypocrites.

End of story?  Not quite.

O’Reilly asked me to go on his show and tell his audience what I thought about Stewart’s take.  What follows is a transcript of what I said:

“I am pleading guilty. And that’s a sincere plea of guilty. I said that liberals think people who live in the middle of the country are a bunch of jerks, and obviously all liberals don’t think that. But I will tell you what, an awful lot of liberal elites think that. I worked with these liberal elites for 28 years at CBS News, and they were always throwing around the term white trash, by which they meant poor southerners who didn’t go to Harvard. I’m not sure why that makes them trash. As far as the middle of the country is concerned, you know, this was flyover country where people flew the flag on the Fourth of July and went bowling and ate at Red Lobster. You know, they were a bunch of hicks. But even all liberal elites don’t think that. So I am saying I was wrong, Jon Stewart is right.”

That’s not something you hear on cable television very often.  A commentator saying, I was wrong.  But that wasn’t the end of the story, either.  I then went on to make another point, looking straight into the camera.

“But let me speak directly to Jon Stewart for just a few of seconds, because I know he watches. He is a big fan of the show. And Jon, if you have an ounce of introspection, you may want to take this seriously. If you just want to be a funny man, who talks to an audience that will laugh at anything you say, that’s okay with me, no problem. But if clearly you want to be a social commentator, more than just a comedian and if you want to be a good one, you better find some guts because even though you criticize liberals as well as conservatives, congratulations on that, when you had Frank Rich on your show, who generalizes all the time about conservatives and Republicans being bigots, you didn’t ask him a single tough question. You gave him a lap dance. You practically had your tongue down his throat. And how about those black columnists who play the race card and generalize about Tea Party people being racists? Why don’t you go after them by name and do it with the same passion and gusto that you use when you are going after Fox people? And how about Bill Maher? Bill Maher generalizes about people who go to church being a bunch of dopes. Is there some rule that says a comic can’t go after another comic?

“Here is my final word, Jon, you can do whatever you want. But if you don’t do that [take on your fellow liberals – with gusto!] guess what? You are not nearly as edgy as you think you are. You are just a safe, Jay Leno with a much smaller audience, but you get to say the f-bomb, which gives your incredibly unsophisticated audience the illusion — the illusion — that you’re courageous and that you’re a renegade. But it’s only an illusion.”

No, there’s no big message here.  No great moral of the story.  Slandering the tea partiers as racists is still wrong.  And implying that all liberals think Middle Americans are dopes is wrong too.  But you know what, it’s not nearly as wrong — because, as I said on O’Reilly’s show, way too many liberal elites look down their noses at “ordinary” Americans.  So here’s one more generalization Jon Stewart won’t like:  Liberal elites  think they’re not only smarter and more sophisticated than the kind of Americans who live in Kansas or Mississippi and like to bowl or eat at Red Lobster – they think they’re … better! And if you don’t believe me, just ask those libs.  They’ll tell you how wonderful they are.

  • Radlax

    One last comment on the brilliance of Bernie’s reporting. He once did a report on Lenny Dykstra, the former baseball player turned “financial guru”, for HBO’s Real Sports. Having been a fan of Lenny’s when he played for the Phillies, it shouldn’t have taken a lot of research to determine that Lenny was really just a con man. Instead, Bernie bought Lenny’s crap hook-line-and-sinker and made things worse by then relying on Jim Cramer, who is more style than substance (just look at Cramer’s prediction last week that the big financial firms were “guaranteed” to come out of the proposed regulation as a winner. Can you say Goldman Sachs?), to verify Lenny’s financial genius.

    Genius, I tell ya. Sheer genius.

  • Jerry

    John Stewart is an idiot looking for ratings. I do believe his viewers are incredibly ignorant to the real world and they think John Stewart is real news. He may seem like he is clever but obviously his vocabulary is severely lacking so he chooses to use the F word in place of words that is not in his vocabulary. Stewart is a typical liberal who thinks everyone should like him, agree with him, agree with the left views and the Presidents radical views. Stewart is a fraud and a disgrace.

    • Justin

      Yeah, I think last night I heard him say “love me, obey me” backwards before going to a commercial.

    • Stephen Colbert

      Didn’t you listen to Bernie when he said how bad it is to generalize?

    • Paul

      John Stewart is an idiot looking for ratings.
      —————–
      trust me. he makes millions and his show has been going on forever.

      I do believe his viewers are incredibly ignorant to the real world and they think John Stewart is real news.
      —————————-
      do you really think people watch him for “real” news?! i watch him for his commentary

      He may seem like he is clever but obviously his vocabulary is severely lacking ——————-

      hahaha

      how many episodes of daily show have you watched? He is waaaay more intelligent that all of Fox people combined.
      oh and his vocabulary is way more extensive than anything on fox news where they simplify everything to “average joe” and they keep saying “people are not that stupid… they understand… etc”
      yeah?! then why you dumb everything down?
      morons…

    • Lunchbreak

      I hate to bring up this point but… I’ve probably seen every Daily Show/Colbert Report episode in the last two or three years, and only a dozen or two of them have been on TV.

      You see, there’s this series of “Tubes”… that doesn’t have a Nielsen box attached to them… and that’s where younger people (and older people who are too busy to tune in at a regular hour) watch their programs.

  • zoso420

    Ignore the hate Bernie. The people posting it are part of the 47% of households that don’t pay any Federal income tax. They will always be slackers and thus drawn to Jon Stewart types.

    • Justin

      True that, Bernie. Just look at this comment:

      Radlax doesn’t pay federal income tax and says:
      April 21, 2010 at 8:25 pm

      One last comment on the brilliance of Bernie’s reporting. He once did a report on Lenny Dykstra, the former baseball player turned “financial guru”, for HBO’s Real Sports. Having been. . .

    • Paul

      didn’t they just do a research about tea party about something just like that?

      oh and by the way, most of stewarts audience is pretty young 24-35 and they likely pay more taxes than fox audience 60+ year olds from the south.

    • Radlax

      I guess that you are completely ignorant of the irony of your comment. Stewart took Bernie to task about making sweeping generalizations (after taking the media to task for doing the same about the tea party movement). So what do you do? Make a sweeping generalization. Since I have a BS in Economics with Honors from Penn State, an MBA from The Wharton School, paid my federal taxes last week and am sitting at my desk at 8 PM on the East Coast completing my work for the day, I guess I’m probably just one of the many that disprove your argument. As for “fact-filled” arguments (which yours is seriously lacking, especially since you give no consideration to the percentage of income paid by lower income individuals in the form of fees, state, county, local, social security, … that cannot be avoided) for you, James C and anyone else, check out my other posts to this site and the Pew Research that I cited showing that the Stewart audiences have one of the highest percentages of college degrees and are among the most well-informed. Same can’t be said of the viewers of those few hours of “news” programming aired by Fox News.

      • Keith Odor-man

        What’s the matter? You couldn’t get into a real business school like Harvard?

        • Lunchbreak

          er… are you really ranking HBS over Wharton?

  • James C

    So many comments by people who’s mentality level is apparently 2 points below plant life. If you don’t get the meaning of this statement, you’re one of them. If you get the meaning of the first statement and identify yourself as one who posted such ridiculous comments, then there’s hope that you can move away up from this mentality plateau and post comments that are meaninful, respectful…..and most of all “fact filled”.

  • laguna Lucy

    Gee Mike, thanks for setting us all straight. I was beginning to wonder what the difference was…. spell check… spell check… spell check…

  • Bill Reiland

    John Stewart … Funny Guy, Bernard Goldberg….Journalist, John Stewart fans, 30% moronic idiots who are polisci major types never paid bills before losers who suck from the teat of the Oboma machime. They cant think for themselves

    • Lunchbreak

      I paid my taxes, I’ve earned six figures, I’m a registered independent, I love Jon Stewart PRECISELY because he mocks hypocrisy. Thinking for yourself (aka: Fact checking) and following O’Reilly does not go together – or that was my revelation 10 years ago.

  • John Robinson

    So, Mr. Goldberg, no conservative comedians can get a fair shake? Drew Carey, self described Libertarian. South Park creators, self described Libertarians. Do you consider Colbert conservative, or is he just another nasty liberal poking fun at you. Then, for the love of God, O’Reilly announces that DENNIS MILLER is going to be on next! Do the two of you REALLY think your viewers are that stupid? Bill, Bernard, let me remind of this story on FOX NEWS!!
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,131021,00.html

    • Bill O’Reilly

      Dennis Miller was a raging liberal up until the Iraq war… do you really believe he would have had the success he has had if he was an outspoken conservative his whole life?

      • John Robinson

        Is he or is he not a conservative?

        • John D

          I agree that some conservative comedians have been given a fair shake. I don’t think there’s any “black list” against conservative comedians. Now conservative ACTORS… a very different story. Unless you’ve WELL established yourself before it was known that you’re a conservative, it’s tough world for them.

          • John Robinson

            Well, the subject was comedians. Actors are another argument :) Again, it’s very easy to create a list of successful conservative and libertarian comedians. Bernard and Bill say they don’t exist because they’re not allowed to. Right before announcing that Dennis Miller is going to be on next! I hope Dennis tore them a fresh one for that blatant lie.

      • Stephen Colbert

        It’s probably not a coincidence that Miller hasn’t been funny since he became a rightwingnut.

        • Stephen

          From one Stephen to another….I love you pal!!!

      • Stephen

        Bill, screw you for making people like my father believe your right wing lies. You, sir, are one of the key players in destroying what the party of Lincoln once proudly stood for. It’s ok to be Republican and if you are, be proud, but EVERYONE should stop watching Faux News. It’s nothing more than a tabloid channel. Why do you think there’s not a Newshounds site for CNN or other news outlets? Why do you think there’s no “OutCNN’d” (Outfoxed). It’s because we know, Bill….and anyone who does their homework knows that too.

        Jerk.

  • laguna Lucy

    its M-O-R-O-N….
    I guess liberals have not figured out how spell check works…. and as long as you are targeting the unsophisticated, this country has its hands full already with the Jon Stewart crowd….

    • Justin

      At least they know what sarcasm is. . .

    • big rip

      Well said Lucy

  • John D

    I’m very much a fan of Bernie’s books and commentary. I also think Jon Stewart is an extremely funny comedian. I was a fan of Stewart’s from way back when he hosted an old MTV show called “You Wrote it, You Watch it”. In this argument, I believe that Bernie wins. No, Jon Stewart has no obligation to be “fair and balanced”, and he’ll use that argument any time someone calls him out for being unfair. But if that’s the case, why does Stewart get a pass when he drops the comedy and starts spreading serious, social commentary? If he can lecture people like Jim Cramer about their character, why can’t others do the same to him? Oh, because he’s a comedian, right? If he’s going to take off the “comedy hat” and lay down a serious insult to someone for being a hypocrite, he should accept being called out on that himself. Don’t hide behind the whole “I’m just a comedian” excuse. Isn’t that “fair and balanced”?

    • John D

      Everyone knows that Jon Stewart doesn’t host a “real” news show. But anyone who thinks that he doesn’t routinely cut the comedy and deliver serious, heartfelt critiques… just isn’t paying attention. When he does that, he drops the “I’m a comedian” shield.

  • Brian Chandler

    A few things… First off, unless thats really Bill O’ Reilly and Stephen Colbert talking.. (which i highly doubt it actually is), how about you stop opening your mouth and making them look bad?

    Second, Jon Stewart was ripping on fox news because their tagline is “fair and balanced” coverage. If you’re going to sell yourself by saying you provide “fair and balanced” coverage, then CLEARLY don’t do that… he has every right to knock you down a few pegs, regardless of whether or not he provides fair and balanced coverage himself. He isn’t making jokes at fox because they are generalizing or whatnot… he’s making jokes at fox because they claim to be fair and balanced, THEN go and generalize in most unfair and unbalanced ways (calling all of the Daily Show fans unsophisticated for example). Also, the defense of Jon saying “he never said he was fair” is a perfectly valid argument. Jon, the daily show, and comedy central ALL make no claims of being a fair and balanced news network. They don’t HAVE that tagline to have to live up to, regardless of what some people’s own personal expectations are (example being “if stewart is going to do news he NEEDS to be fair and balanced…” Thats a personal opinion, it isn’t stated anywhere that a news network has to be fair and balanced… except of course ON FOX).

  • Bill O’Reilly

    My show is on right now and Bernie is going to respond again. Maybe some of you liberals can learn something.

    • Lunchbreak

      Thusfar I’ve learned that you don’t know what you’re talking about. We’re 5 minutes in.

      • Bill O’Reilly

        Thus far I have learned that you are unable to read. My comment was posted at 8:01.

        Bill O’Reilly says:
        April 21, 2010 at 8:01 pm

        • Lunchbreak

          Being in the business, I thought you understood commercial breaks. *chuckle*

          As we’re clear that you’re not Mr. O’Reilly, there’s not much else to say.

  • Hank

    now how can he say he was wrong about generalizing then say this, You are just a safe, Jay Leno with a much smaller audience, but you get to say the f-bomb, which gives your incredibly unsophisticated audience the illusion — the illusion — that you’re courageous and that you’re a renegade. But it’s only an illusion. You are going to take a shot at people watching a comedy network to laugh. you are a terrible excuse of a man to call out viewers of a show like that have some respect.

  • sparky satori

    Sour grapes from all the Fox BeeGees.

    Study after study has illustrated that the most horribly ill-informed and misinformed citizens watch Fox News. That’d be YOUR doing, Bernie. Similarly, study after study has demonstrated that people younger than BG receive more of their news content from JS and SC than any other source. That would ALSO be YOUR doing, Bernie.

    BG: “….as I said on O’Reilly’s show, way too many liberal elites look down their noses at “ordinary” Americans.”

    Citation please? Oh, you don’t HAVE one? Because it’s just the most recent baseless assertion you pulled out of your posterior? Like to just make shit up as you go along?

    Say, you DO have a future with Fox.

    • JD

      What studies? You ask for citations but you didn’t cite these supposed studies. You accuse someone of baseless assertations but you did the same baseless assertation. To generalize any audience is silly there are intelligent people that watch Fox News & Jon Stewart.

      • sparky satori

        Hey JD, is your Google contraption not working? ‘Coz mine takes a whole ten seconds to find both.

        Now do your OWN homework.

  • Matt

    Bernie, you are completely wrong on so many levels. For one thing, I am a Stewart fan and ALSO a political science major. I don’t appreciate you calling his entire audience incredibly unsophisticated. Secondly, I have been on many websites where right wing people make incredibly horrible statements about both journalists and politicians. If you want to debate, try using facts instead of bias.. Oh.. i guess its not really a requirement for FOX.

  • Karen

    Bernie, Bernie, Bernie I am one of the well educated, free thinking, fair minded people who you denigrated for watching Jon Stewart. The difference between you and Jon is that Jon doesn’t have to lie to sell his point of view. Jon is broadminded and and cares for “the least of these”. You sir, are no Jon Stewart. I feel pity for you because one day you will have to answer to a higher power for your unfeeling human condition.

    • Chuck

      My considerably educated sentiments exactly, Karen. Jon’s audience does represent the least of Christ’s brethren. Hell, I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if Jon takes the left hand of the Father at the white throne judgement.

      Hell awaits, Bernie. HELL AWAITS FOR ALL YOU RACIST, POOR-HATING, VIOLENT, HILLBILLY TEA PARTY CONSERVATIVES WHO DON’T PARTAKE OF THE CHURCH OF JON.

      You tell ‘em, Karen.

      • big rip

        Jon Stewart is already in hell, go join him

  • Benjamin Logan Weaver

    Bearnie Goldberg you are a tool for even retaliating in this matter. The only reason you dont find Jon Stewart funny is because of your narrow minded views on all matters. Lets be honest you got your ass handed to you and you didnt know how to react so you tried to fight back and got it handed to you once again in the daily episode on the night of the 20th. I recommend you give up at this point.

  • kawkajun

    You are on a NEWS show (allegedly). There is a lot of news out there today that needs to be discussed seriously. You spend valuable airtime that should be devoted to the extremely pressing events of the day to respond to what some guy on a comedy show said about you? Unfortunately, that is precisely why many folks look to comedy shows and blogs to get information on these topics that mainstream media won’t. If you had any class or integrity as a journalist and any maturity as an adult, you would simply ignore what a comedian says about you. Same goes for the network that employs you.

    Extremely lame.

    KK

    • Anonymous

      true..true

  • Anonymous

    It’s a well-known and well-established fact that Bernard Goldberg is a vile hatemonger who helped “inspire” Jim David Adkisson’s murderous rampage in Knoxville, Tennessee on on July 27, 2008. You can google the details, including the murderer’s own words: “This was a symbolic killing. Who I wanted to kill was every Democrat in the Senate & House, the 100 people in Bernard Goldberg’s book.” Bernie Goldberg is a * scumbag.

    * I posted the above at 6:03 p.m. and it was deleted. I guess in addition to being a vile hatemonger, Bernie is also a coward. Now I have to post this all over the Web. I hope Olbermann again mentions Bernie’s inciteful rhetoric that led to murder.

    • Gregg

      Well “Anonymous”…you say Bernie is a coward???? and you use anonymous? Be careful there you may blow out one of the three brain cells you have left. Geez….You libs make it so easy. We don’t have to call you nuts….you prove it with every breath you take. hahaha

      • John Robinson

        I called Mr. Goldberg a coward much earlier today on this forum. I used my real name. Speak up Gregg.

      • Justin

        Yeah! Don’t be a hypocrite! If you are going to make claims and such, tell us who you are if you are man enough!

        Like Gregg. . . Uhh. . . I guess last names don’t matter, but yeah!

        • Gregg

          Gregg Stephens in South Carolina

          • John Robinson

            Where in SC Gregg? I made it pretty clear where I could be found a few posts ago.

      • hickory

        Excuse me, Gregg: My name is hickory. So what’s the difference anyway? You want my address so your ilk can terrorize my family the way you people do? Joe Klein was right when he used the word seditious with regard to FOX, Beck and Hannity. I heard seditious rhetoric coming out of Limbaugh’s maw today. And Goldberg is cut from the same cloth. Next time Bernie deletes my post, I’ll re-post as hickory.

        • Gregg

          No hickory. I don’t care what your address is. I don’t terrorize anyone. I find this quite amusing. You just prod one liberal, go get your popcorn and watch the show. They will make idiots out of themselves no matter what.

          hahahaha

      • John Robinson

        Let me make it easier.

        John Robinson says:
        April 21, 2010 at 8:33 am

        “In the big scheme of things what Jon Stewart says about me or what I say about him doesn’t amount to much.”
        Quite true. You’re both entertainers and that’s what entertainers sometimes do. Instead, you’ve taken it one step further and labeled me “incredibly unsophisticated” with no more knowledge of me than the the fact that I watch The Daily Show. That makes it personal and does amount to something. Would you say that to someone you’ve never met sitting next to you at a bar? Sir, you have just proven who the self-appointed elite truly is. It is you. I won’t begrudge you your success, but I would be ashamed if it were mine. A bully pulpit from which you label me as “incredibly unsophisticated” is not just hollow, it’s cowardly.

    • Doug McCarthy

      Personal accountability has never been the liberal way of doing things – I simply cite 1) not using your name 2) blamming murder on the so-call inspiration and not the murdered himself. I guess name calling is all you got mister anonymous. Oh wait that’s probably societies fault for dealing you a lousy hand eh?

      • hickory

        No way, José. Call me whatever you like. This ain’t worth getting vandalized over. I made that mistake once already and I know all too well how you right-wingers operate.

        • John Robinson

          Hickory, I appreciate your wariness. So far, I haven’t had the experience of one of these Keyboard Kowboys retaliating. I’m pretty sure I’d be OK though. I hope you are now too.

  • Gregg

    Great job Bernie! You were correct in telling Megan that we would not go to John’s website and say such things. In fact I wouldn’t go to his website PERIOD! The man is a raving idiot and is best ignored. I guess he thinks he is relevant in some manner. he is no more that a fly buzzing around a mule’s behind. Just a nuisance.

  • j.l.

    Yah, I’d sure hate to “resort” to being on Fox News, because nobody watches them. Wait! Most people watch them. “Fox News is considered to be a colossal joke wordwide.” Really? Thanks for the info to back that claim up. And one more thing, professor- What the world thinks doesn’t matter. They’re still the most watched cable news show here, which does matter. Only libs worry about the French think. Nice try, though.

  • Sir Von Lichtenstein

    Going head to head against a skilled comedian, and asking him for “fair and balanced” interviews (as if he were a News analyst!) is very idiotic. We know that in showbiz, which our Newsmedia has become, any publicity is considered to be good publicity. This is either a calculated publicity stunt by Golberg, or an idiotic temper tantrum. I can not decide which.

  • Doug McCarthy

    Bernie,

    I am extremely thankful for your understanding of the political landscape and am embarrassed that these smut mouth individuals, that don’t spend time reading history or reading to learn about issues resort to this sewer rat conduct. Keep up the good work Bernie!!!

    Doug

  • Mark D’Truth

    I have read through several pages of comments Bernie and I am still looking for the “vile and hateful” ones. Perhaps my definitions for vile and hateful are just different than yours. My suggestion to you is if you can’t take the heat get out of the kitchen. Stewart has gone after MANY pundits and politicians in his time on the Daily Show. And they had a choice, ignore him or respond. You elected to respond. And in your response you not only criticized Stewart, but you also belittled his audience. Did you expect his audience to just roll over and allow you to insult them just because you’re Bernard Goldberg? Did you think you could call into question their intelligence and level of sophistication and not have them come to your website and retaliate? You brought all of this on yourself because you decided that Jon Stewart needed to live up to FoxPAC’s tagline. Your characterization of his audience’s messages are as inaccurate as the “news” that FoxPAC reports every day. What I think is that you are a thin-skinned pundit who is out of his element. You should wave the white flag and go back to the friendly confines of FoxPAC before some of Stewart’s audience get really “vile and hateful”. From my point of view you are coming off as an authoritarian, ultra-conservative tyrant who’s trying to censure a comedian. You have the audacity to tell Stewart what he must do in order to obtain your consent, as if he needs or wants it, while continuing to mischaracterize FoxPAC’s GOP agenda as being “fair and balanced”. You and your network are a failure. (Was that “vile and hateful” too?)

    • cxt

      Mark

      And speaking as a fan of the show—Jon S show….I don’t recall you–or anyone else in his fan base taking ANY exception to Jon S…what was your term again……ah, yes. “belittling” OTHER people.

      So you, in high peak, decide to post your ire about how BG “belittled” the DAily Show audience, yet are utterly silent about Jon S SOP of “belittlement” of others.

      I can only conclude that you have NO problem with “belittlement”—you only kick when you, personally, feel that you personally have been “belittled.”

      You would make a stronger case and better point if it were not so clearly evident that you only have feelings for others when “the others” are you and your buddies.

      Perhaps, since you now know how it feels and can now relate when somebody “belittles” a fellow human being, you can speak out when Jon S does it.

      Or is that to high a level of “sophistication” to expect of you?

    • Bill O’Reilly

      You sir, need to flock back more than just two pages to see vile comments. The vile comments came after Stewart’s reply last night on his show. The polite comments from the last few hours came from when Bernie was just on fox around 2:30.

    • Eric

      I guess I am not sophisticated enough for you, Mr. Goldberg. I’ll take my six years of military service in the Air Force and walk away.

  • DIANNA

    I guess Fox just got a taste of their own medicine…..they can dish it out….sure can”t take it……there is a lot of hate at Fox….they get the real facts wrong…..people are beginning to realize this…..do not get the country in a hate basis over where in the USA we live…..do not twist the facts…….

  • Sir Von Lichtenstein

    bernie Go F yourself ……hahaha

    • cxt

      Sir Von Lichtenstein

      Although I’m not sure that “Sir Von Lichtenstein” has the right to use either “Sir” or the “Von” ;)

      He/She/It does prove my point rather well.

      But again, I just don’t get the point of crouching behind a keyboard, under a screen-name, from perhaps half a world away and pretending to be a tough guy/gal.

      I just don’t get it.

      Perhaps as a follow-up Sir Lichtenstein is going to pinch a baby, or step on an ant. ;)

      Or perhaps he/she/it is still young enough that “dirty talk” being “naughty” and all is still thrilling?
      Perhaps when Sir Lichtenstein begins to drive and date better uses of their time might be found.

      • Sir Von Lichtenstein

        cxt

        Thank you for your comments. I dont find dirty talk “thrilling’. I am just immature.

        This is all very amusing. All this is a publicity stunt that helps both Stewart and Gordberg. Look. I would not have, in a million years think to look up Bernie Goldberg’s website, but here I am, on his website forum (for the last time I assure you). I wonder how many hits he got on his website today!

        In showbiz– which cable news channels these days are part of anyway– any publicity is good publicity. Some “celebrities” get cought on sex tapes; others throw temper tantrums and pick fights with Comedy Central comedians (absurd!) At the end it is all about ratings, and getting your name out there. Before you know it, this nobody has his/her own perfume line or blockbuster movie or conservative radioshow. We dont care though. We continue to just eat it up. Because it is so darn amusing.

        Now off to US Magazine.

  • Concerned_Citizen

    I’m not really sure if playing a news clip and then making funny faces at the camera makes you a “comedian.” (Seriously, if you haven’t watched The Daily Show, that’s 90% of it – clip, Stewart funny face, repeat.) Let’s not flatter Jon. He’s just another biased commentator – and sees his own faults mirrored in pundits on the other side of the aisle. Key word “pundits.”

    Attacking Fox News Channel for having conservative pundits is pretty stupid. That’s what gets ratings. (Why did CNN hire Eric Erickson?) Those on the Left in the media need to stop fooling themselves that they’re performing a public service – Stewart certainly isn’t. We all know the majority of young people are getting their news from Stewart and Colbert (Pew Research). I don’t care if you’re liberal or conservative, isn’t that scary?

    • Radlax

      Concerned,

      The Stewart/Colbert audiences don’t watch those shows to “get” their news information. They come to the table to watch a satirization of what they “believe”. Now you might disagree with what they believe, but it would be impossible to find much of what Jon does as funny if you had no knowledge of the topic being discussed.

      This isn’t the same as watching “Two and a Half Men” where you can come in as uninformed. For instance, during the health care debate, Jon made fun of the argument of “death panels”. An uninformed viewer: i) would not understand that death panels were being used as an argument by one side of the debate, would not know what was meant by death panels and iii) would not understand the absurdity of the death panel argument in Stewart’s eyes if they did not understand the concept beforehand. Therefore, the jokes would not be funny and he would have failed in his comedy.

      Since you quoted Pew Research, let’s go right to the source. Here’s a link to the Pew Research on how informed self-identified audiences were: http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions

      Do you want to guess who was tied with major newspaper web sites for the highest percentage of “High Knowledge Level” audiences? Stewart/Colbert at 54%. O’Reilly scored slightly higher when “High” and “Moderate” are aggregated. And Limbaugh ties Stewart at 79% for “High” and “Moderate” audience.

      In terms of education, Stewart scores once again above-average in terms of the percentage of his audience with a college education at 31% versus the national average of 27%. Here O’Reilly falters, relatively speaking, with only 24% having college education. At least Limbaugh continues to hold his own with 36% of his audience with a college education. But since you brought Pew out as proof for your argument, it would seem that both you and Bernie don’t really know what you are talking about.

      And where is the vaunted Fox News? Bringing up the rear with morning news shows (e.g., Today, GMA, …) at 35% High and 30% Moderate. So if you are really concerned, you should be concerned about those that watch Fair and Balanced Fox.

      • Mark D’Truth

        What a great source! If any of these Bernie fans ever took the time to watch Jon they would know that in order to understand his humor you need to be tuned into current affairs. Perhaps that is why so few of them think he is funny. Am I displaying an elitist attitude? Only if you think someone who is elitist is also someone who is informed. More than once I have seen people with little understanding of a particular topic dismiss it as irrelevant. It is how they validate themselves.

  • ayoung

    Get ‘em Bernie — You are dead-on right about the snobbery of the self-appointed liberal elite. Their smugness wafts across the U.S. like the abrasive ash from an Icelandic volcano.

    • Mark D’Truth

      The ash, like the conservatives imagined smugness and snobbery of the liberal elite, also hasn’t entered the USA.

      • Mia Ping

        Ok; I am so confused. Either we are unsophisticated or self-appointed liberal elite? How do you bend the premise both ways?

        I am surprised to see there hasn’t been an expose on Fox News about how the volcano in Iceland erupting was a Liberal conspiracy.

        Jon Stewart is amazing. Simply amazing.

    • ayoung

      There are certainly many of the liberal elite who one could call sophisticated, the late Senator Patrick Moynihan being a prime example. The elite nature of Senator Moynihan, however, was neither self-appointed nor smug. He was a good, decent, highly-intelligent man of the left without an ounce of condescension. By contrast there are some liberals who are “elite” only because they have made that evaluation of themselves. The self-appointed liberal “elite” are often insulated from opposing points of view in the schools they attend, their workplaces, and their communities, resulting in a rather unsophisticated view of the world, a view driven more by ideology than empirical evidence.

  • cxt

    I like Jon Stewart–I enjoy his show…….however, I really dislike:

    1-His craven “I’m just doing comedy/satire” when he is called out on facts, his ahm…”reasoning”, or his rigor in thinking.

    None of which would be an issue save for the whole “wink-wink” “nudge-nudge” act he does for his political comments pretense of “comedy.”

    If he wants to deal in political speech then he should be held to the same standard as everyone else……”funny” is not an excuse for sloppy thinking, poor reasoning and lack of evidence.

    2-His oft-used stance—again in this case of “I never said I was fair defense (my paraphrase) which essentially means he is not fair–he is aware that he is not fair BUT that is somehow “ok” since he never claimed he was……ah, note to Jon S that STILL means you are being, quite purposely, unfair.

    3-His use of curse words…….telling a guy much older than himself—from the safe distance of his protected studio to “go F himself” is hardly the mark of lion—I seriously doubt Jon S would care to repeat the remark outside of his studio—perhaps to Goldberg face? I would say the chances are between slim and none.

    Sure, we live in a world that is less violent—-but hand in hand with that “safer” world is that people are not really in much danger telling people to “go F themselves” anymore.

    To judge by the giggles and laughter of Jon S audience when he said it, they seemed to be impressed by his using the “F word.”
    Again, I’m not.
    Telling a guy much older than you, from a considerable distance away, from the safety of a protected studio, in nation that has did away with “fighting words” laws years ago, is hardly a feat worth comment, or courage…..intellectual or physical.

    • Radlax

      Really, you think that Jon Stewart would be afraid to tell Bernie to go F himself in person? Why? What would Bernie do? Slap him in the face with a glove and challenge him to dueling pistols at dawn? Come on and get real. We’re talking about Bernie Goldberg here and not Mike Tyson in regards to your comment about “safety”. If you have a problem with Stewart dropping an F bomb, I can understand your point. But you make yourself look really silly when you say that Stewart would be afraid of Bernie and wouldn’t say it to his face. Did you ever watch Stewart’s interview with Jim Cramer? He didn’t become a pussycat when Cramer sat down across from him. He raked him over the coals. There is such a vast archive of the hypocrisy of Bernie out there that if he ever sat down with Stewart again, Jon would turn to the camera a multitude of times and say “Roll tape XX” and show another instance of where Bernie says one thing to defend conservatives but use the same memes against liberals. Bernie’s argument that he was talking about “liberal elites” was such a joke after he got called on the carpet. I guess that Pelosi/Olbermann/Reid/Rather/… then have the same right to amend any remarks that might have insulted conservatives and say that they really meant “conservative elites”.

      • Mark D’Truth

        Jon’s interview with Mark Thune was extraordinary. He never backed down and he had a counter-point for every one of Thune’s talking points. It was obvious that Jon was very well prepared.

  • True Conserative34

    Well I guess since all of the “intellectuals” from the fans of Jon Leibowitz are leaving there derogatory comments then I should leave a retort.
    First of all Bernie people who watch the daily show think that it is funny, edgy and witty because it’s a wannabe comedian making fun of conservatives for the most part. There are writers for the show who write most of Leibowitz’ material so he doesn’t come up with all of that on his own.
    Second Bernie I don’t care and neither does most of the country what Leibowitz or any of his fans think. I have met a lot of people that think that his show is funny and it’s only because they are liberals that don’t like Fox News.
    And third the only reason that most liberals hate Fox is because we have a news channel that is not for them and they just can’t stand it! I think its funny and I always laugh when I read comments like the ones above. It’s the same garbage they always spew and it just gets funnier every time I see it! Thanks a lot libs for showing just how much FOX and the conservative movement is getting to you!

    • Stephen Colbert

      We’re not mocking you because you’re “getting to us”, we mocking you because there is no reason to respect you. The Bush/Cheney disaster has exposed you people as ignorant frauds.

    • Radlax

      True Con,

      I’m curious? Why do you refer to Jon Stewart as Jon Leibowitz? He legally changed his name to Stewart. That’s his right in society. I don’t know for a fact all of the reasons. I do know that his parents were divorced at a young age. He wouldn’t be the first to change his last name due to estrangement from his father, if that’s the reason why.

      To phrase my question in a different way, I’m going to assume that your mother had the same last name as your father. She changed it for her own very valid set of reasons. How would your mother have responded if people continued to refer to her as Mary Jones when her last name was Smith. If you’re married and now have the same last name as your spouse, how would you react if whoever is the wife in your relationship was always called by their maiden name. I’m guessing that in both instances you would correct the individual and if they would continue you would tell them to “grow up”. Well, True Con, “Grow up”.

      Second, what is the point about Stewart having writers mean? Do you honestly think that O’Reilly/Beck/Hannity or whoever else that you watch walks out on stage without a script of talking points that they typed themselves? Get real. They employ writers and researchers just like Stewart. The difference is that Stewart employs comedy writers that are paid to write jokes as opposed to writing straight-up talking points.

      Finally, I really don’t care that you have a “news channel” (if that’s what you want to call it) to yourselves. But I am concerned that you are watching programs that do a piss-poor job of properly informing you and that you then get to go out and vote. What’s the basis of my assertion? I have another post here that references a Pew study showing that Fox News viewers are one of the most ill-informed audiences out there. But here’s the link as proof for you to see that Fox News fails to deliver the news http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions

      • Mark D’Truth

        It might be harder writing for Beck, Hannity and O’Reilly than it is writing for Jon. Writing comedy is tough, but writing all those LIES must be torture.

  • Craig Philips

    One constant about the liberal blogisphere is an attitude of indisputable superiority of intellect and reason. Those who disagree with the Democratic standard bearers are ill-bred, uneducated, racist buffoons who spend their spare evenings attending Klan rallies or peeing behind the bleachers at Nascar races. Mr. Stewart is the arrogant, smirking personification of the liberal media double standard. It is clear that he believes he is better than those who disagree with him, and he knows it. But Mr. Stewart in fact is merely a master of the snappy comeback, a glib little man offering little depth of analysis who should sport a motley, replete with merry bells. I will admit that, in many ways, I do not have much in common with many of the Tea Party activists. Yet, the current attitude of the Left – wherein they will tolerate no opposing opinion – is indefensible. Reasonable people of all political stripes should come together to vocally oppose the likes of Mr. Stewart and the other masters of double-standard commentary.

  • John Robinson

    “Liberal elites think they’re not only smarter and more sophisticated than the kind of Americans who live in Kansas or Mississippi and like to bowl or eat at Red Lobster – they think they’re … better!”

    Gosh Bernie. Here in Indiana, the bowling alleys have half shut down. There is a phenomenal Cajun joint between my home and Red Lobster called Papa Roux’s. I frequent a pub called the Mass Ave. Pub. It tends to be a hangout for Liberal Elite Firemen. You can tell it must be liberal because Sun King and Oberon beer outsell anything else. Has that plane ever actually landed between “Manhattan and Malibu?” You have a LOT of opinion ‘splainin to do when it comes to the way we all is livin’ out here in the hinterlands. Honestly, a reverse snobbery may actually be worse than overt snobbery. You really have NO clue how the people you defend live, do you.

    • True Conserative34

      Listen buddy I live in Indy too and yes I know all about Mass Ave! Don’t even get started about how you live in Indy and are so sophisticated. I live at 86th and Ditch and I don’t even come close to acting like you do. Do me a favor and next time leave out where you live because you just embarrassed most of us that live here in Indy!

      • John Robinson

        So you would prefer I not describe Indianapolis as it is? I didn’t call myself sophisticated. I certainly didn’t mean to offend you by implying you are. My question remains. Does Mr. Goldberg have even the first clue how the areas and the people he defends really are?

      • John Robinson

        As I pointed out in a much earlier post. I never say or type anything that I wouldn’t say to someone I never met in a bar. You know where I frequent. I’m easy to spot. If you see a black motorcycle or a green one, I’m there. You know my name.

  • BernieWho-QM

    Spitballs at a Battleship??? Really? For a Battleship you really don’t respond with any degree of force or specificity (Perhaps you’re implying you’re so much more popular than Stewart – if so, that IS pretty funny – I’d guess the vast majority of the population has never heard of you before now, but everyone knows Stewart). The bottom line is everyone but Bill O’Reilly knows that Fox is NOT fair and balanced. This is the issue Stewart raises. Responding that Stewart needs to “Man Up” to be fair and balanced makes no sense. Megyn Kelly has the right of it – Stewart makes fun of pompous news personalities (does the shoe fit?) – he could care less about being fair and balanced, nor should he be.

    But is he funny? Heck yeah. And political commentary through comedy is hardly a new thing, Bernie.

    • Bill O’Reilly

      I think by spitballs at a battleship he was referring to Fox being a bazillion times more powerful than Jon Stewart.

  • Bill

    Mr. Bernie

    I respect what you do and I listen to you whenever you are on the various FOX Shows. Stewart is a small person and we should all just let him fade away. He will eventually fall away and his type of humor is low class to boot. Again you have a good message and you are inteeligent about the way you present your views.

    Hang in there and know many of us enjoy your comments and perspective.

    Bill B

    • Mark D’Truth

      You have obviously never watched The Daily Show. Jon Stewart’s humor can certainly be crass, but it is also sophisticated and insightful. Your characterization of Stewart as being a “small person” is accurate in terms of his physicality, but inaccurate in terms of his popularity. I will guarantee you that if you stopped 100 people on the street in ANY city in America, and showed them a picture of Jon, and a picture of Bernie, 90 out of 100 would be able to identify Jon, while 5 out of 100 would know who Bernie is. So if you consider Jon a “small person” because you believe him to be unrecognizable by the average American, then what would you call Bernie, a “microscopic person”?

      • Gordie

        I watch The Daily Show every single day, I am college educated. I find it a little funny that Bernie thinks that generalizing a group of people is how he responds to a criticism about being to generalizing. I find it utterly amazing that Fox News still exists with idiots like Bernie and Glen Beck. Frankly Gerry, Bernie is an idiot. If all of you people who believe that Jon Stewart doesn’t fully research his topics of discussion then maybe you should do some research of your own. The man hosts a fake news show, for the simple purpose of making people laugh. Just listen to one of his interviews sometime. I mean really listen, then tell me how little prepared he is. Time magazine did an article on Jon a few years back which said that there are few, if ANY, actual reporters that are even half as prepared as he is. It makes you look stupid to make a public announcement that someone needs to check their facts and you haven’t even tried. Google works, I’ve tried it. The next time you all want to say that someone who disagrees with your world view it may help you to use some sort of fact checking system before making yourself look even worse.

        • Gordie

          And Jon has been on air since 1999. I’ve watched the show ever since he began hosting it and he has only gotten bigger and more influential. He will not fade away, because too many true Americans who care about their country agree with him.

          • Rachel Madcow

            Does your mom join you in her basement to watch the show with you?

  • Carl Monty

    Jon Stewart is respected both on the left and the right. He may be a poster boy for liberalism, but he is always willing to have a frank discussion with the right. It is a bad idea to attack him, he will make you look bad up and down, left and right with your own words. Be careful, this man is a verbal assassin and you don’t want to be on the wrong side of that, just look at Cramer.

    • Mark D’Truth

      Excellent characterization of Jon Stewart. How would you characterize Bernie Goldberg?

    • hans delbrucke

      Funny thing about the Cramer interview. Stewart raked him over the coals. Less than two weeks later Stewart had Barnie Frank on, and threw softballs at him. Frank had so much to do with the financial crisis we faced and Stewart damn near slipped him the tongue.

  • Burke

    It is true that Bernie will not be able to beat Stewart with Stewart’s own audience, but Stewart’s audience is not even a majority within the minority of what passes for intellectualism within pop culture. What neither Stewart nor his audience understand, is that they are in the eyes of their own left wing elite and the Country Club Socialists of the east coast, just common, simple people. Not even a Harvard Degree can change that. To most Americans, the Ivy League is over rated, the media and press in general are far left of center and about as objective as Al Qaeda, and John Stewart is a simple man.

  • Justin

    I regularly watch the Daily Show, but I just gotta agree with a few above me. By simply responding with your ‘better than thou’ attitude, you simply set yourself up for more comedic criticisms.

    I find it quite literary that his big insult culminated to ‘go f— yourself’ to someone who thinks so highly of himself.

    But really, if you wish to be the bigger man, which is the side you seem to be playing, please just shut up about it. You only besmirch your own reputation by responding.

  • xcxcxc

    Jon Stewart ROCKS. He is the BEST in his class.

  • Marie

    Among other things, Jon’s dance routine (as shown today on the Fair and Balanced Fox News) made me think of a duck squirming around to attempt to get out of the muck! Also, his comments prove he isn’t intelligent enough to produce a program without being crass and crude. You’re right, Bernie, I’m on your battleship – the one that you handle with intelligence and class.

    • the truth

      wow, its C-O-M-E-D-Y, say it with me.

      Did you watch the clip that h originally said go f yourself to?

      It was ‘Bernie’ who claimed that liberal elites certainly would not allow themselves to have mentally challenged offspring. Stewart called him out on this – it is dumb because not only is it NOT true, its dumb because its hard to believe that somebody on TV who has ‘considerable influence’ over individuals would even speak such words.

      You think he is unintelligent? And his audience too?

      People watch that show because it shows how much BS Bernie and Fox News actually throw at people on any given day of the week. I would say that Bernie and his fox buddies are unintelligent – they are nothing more than agents of and for the GOP.

      Fair and Balanced in that they express not only real right wing libertarian views, but also right wing republican views.

      Maybe you need to sit down and think about the crap fox throws at you, you might just have a revelation.

  • Dave

    The problem is, as Linda Ellerbee pointed out years ago, everybody on TV thinks they are important and correct in everything they say and do.

    The key difference here is the method used. For the most part, Stewart uses comedy and Fox uses a sledgehammer. I presume you noticed O’Reilly didn’t agree with you at all – he truly sees himself (and Fox) as fair, balanced and above criticism. Bravo to you, Bernie, for accepting criticism. Unfortunately, you are alone on your network in that regard.

    Two other small points. In your interview with Megyn Kelly, you said you thought those who agreed with you would not write vile things to Stewart. That’s naive and self-serving. The nature of the debate today is there is no middle ground available. You are either with us or against the country. And if you are with us, you have to be sharply critical of those who are not.

    Secondly, both Fox and Stewart are working with friendly audiences. The Foxfan doesn’t want to hear anything nice ever said about the president or anybody who agrees with him. The Stewart fan doesn’t ever want to hear anything nice about those who disagree with the president.

    This is Fox’s doing. They forced the divide to get an audience. We are now seeing the (rotten) fruits of that effort.

  • Tim

    Bernie,

    I’m a huge fan of Jon Stewart, but I give you credit for standing up for yourself. With that said, I have to disagree with your contention that Liberal “elites” are continually looking down their nose at others. Sure, in our society there are folks on both sides of the isle who look down on others. I often hear those on the Right labeling those on welfare as being “lazy”.

    My question for you is this. Why is a liberal who works hard to become wealthy labeled an “elitist” by you, while those who do the same on the Right are considered “hard working American’s”

    • Winston Galt

      The answer Tim, is quite simple. Liberals spend an awful lot of their time pursuing laws and regulations that amount to attempting to protect the population from themselves.

      In other words, “we know better than you, so we’re going to confiscate and spend a huge portion of the earnings of Hard Working Americans on programs that will benefit the greater good (which we the Elite certainly understand and you the Hard Working Americans certainly don’t), and on programs that deal with the inevitable ramifications of your own innate stupidity”.

      Hard Working Americans, on the other hand, spend an awful lot of time working their butts off to improve their own financial status, and will likely choose to spend their own money (not confiscated earnings) to contribute to charitable work they believe in (it’s a proven statistic that conservatives consistently spend a higher percentage of income on charitable contributions than liberals).

  • Bill W.

    Bernie, forget about John Stewart. He is a third class comedian. You are a journalist who has decades of accomplishments.

    Don’t get into a spat with a Stewart, he and his audience are unintelligent tree-hugging liberals.

  • Harvard

    I think you are great and your were right on bout stewart. Keep up the GREAT work you are doing.

  • Gerry Patrick

    Bernie

    I love you but stop opening your mouth about Jon Stewart – you can not beat him at what he does best. He is making you look like an idiot.

    Gerry

  • Berg

    Why in earth is Jon Stewart considered smart?
    Being smart means, or at least is used to mean, get to the correct conclusion based on given facts. As far as I can see, Jon Stewart isn’t doing that.

    • Tim

      Berg, Can you give an example of a conclusion that Jon Stewart came to that wasn’t based on facts?

      • the truth

        better yet, can you give an example of a conclusion that FOX came to that was correct? Based on true facts?

        thought so

  • Chip Matthews

    I am a conservative 35 year old male, and I love the Daily Show and Colbert. Jon is just angry at the ratings that Fox News is getting. If Bernie needs ammo, I have some advice. Use clips the way Jon does. Jon Stewart has done the insult, then run behind the “I’m a comedian” routine before. When Tucker Carlson had Crossfire on CNN in 2004, Jon was on; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFB5YpDZE
    He gives the excuse that he has puppets prank calling people leading into his show. Unfortunately his show, and the Colbert Report are more relevant than Jon Stewart would ever admit to. Pew Research Center has found his show to be a primary source of news for many young people, an assertion the show’s staff have repeatedly rejected. He continues to hide behind the comedian tag, even as he is irresponsibly representing news to our nations youth. Sure, he did a small token jab at Rachel Madcow, and he has been very critical of the Obama administration on occasion. Or ignore him, but realize that he does have more power than he would even give himself in a creepy hand that rocks the cradle kind of way.

    • Not a hater

      Hi Mr. Goldberg,

      I will begin a Master’s in Journalism program (in Canada btw because it’s hell of a lot cheaper) in the fall and when I was interviewed by the faculty they asked whether I thought Jon Stewart was a journalist or not. I have been asked the same question when I interviewed for an internship position with a magazine. There is a whole class on this issue at the Univ. I will be attending, and while it can be a loaded question, I think the only thing he does on the show that would be considered journalism is the interviews he does. Otherwise he just seems to aggregate Fox stories (which isn’t news is it?) and point out hypocrisies which are quite humorous and dead on.

      I’m an idealistic person who hopes to see the reduction of left vs. right media in the U.S. This is why I don’t watch Fox and why I don’t “get my news” from Stewart.

      Respectfully (up) yours

  • Shannon

    Way to add a little colour to the great discourse Jon!
    Bernie, you are only perpetuating the situation by responding. If Stewart is as insignificant and unsophisticated as his “small audience” then maybe you should refrain from participating in this back-n-forth.

    Just a thought.

    -A Canadian voyeur

  • amanda

    Bernie, I watch The Daily Show regularly, and I deeply resent being called “unsophisticated”. Most of the people who watch that show are anything but unsophisticated, and are often highly educated and intelligent individuals. But intelligent, sophisticated people still know when a good “go f-ck yourself” is due. Fox News is laughable- unintentionally funny, and not remotely in a legitimately humorous way. Fox News doesn’t really need The Daily Show to point out all its shortcomings. You didn’t have to go after Jon Stewart. You obviously think you’re better than he is, and that he’s just a lowly comedian- so why bother? But you, sir, have hung yourself with your own rope. Maybe I’m just generalizing, but people who don’t ‘get’ The Daily Show seem, to me, to be the ones who are unsophisticated.

    • Shannon

      Agreed.
      I think my Harvard educated, Daily Show watching, friends from the south would sourly disagree with your take on Jon Stewart’s fans. :)

      • Joseph

        Agreed. I could not have said it better myself.

        • D-san

          Agreed! It’s odd to me that Bernie and his ilk talk down to Stewart and the Daily Show audience simply because they enjoy some sardonic spin in their news pieces. I’m betting they’re laughing right now because I used the phrase “news pieces,” but that just goes to show how, well, unsophisticated they are. History is rife with comedic figures who have spoken great truths about their leaders and nations, and the people who hearken to those comedians are generally better informed because they have to dig beneath that laughter if they want to find out what’s at the bottom of it all. In other words, the Daily Show audience isn’t spoon-fed liberal tools. Quite the contrary: We know a bad joke when we see one.

    • Chris

      Well said. Also, I find it sad that these washed up individuals (“journalists”) have to resort to being on Fox News, which is, frankly, considered to be colossal joke worldwide. Perhaps not with the Fox people Bernie frequents, but outside of that bubble – definitely.

  • K Banker

    and you’re right, Eric, but it goes the other way as well.

  • K Banker

    Hello,

    I heard this speech and I would like to put it to the public as to whether or not I am unsophisticated.

    - I watch The Daily Show
    - I’m currently employed as an AmeriCorps with the American Red Cross
    - I have a honors BS in Political Science and International Studies
    - I will soon be working on a duel Master of Science and Public Administration
    - I worked as a Director for my Undergraduate Student Government
    - I’m from Arizona

    Am I unsophisticated?

    • http://www.facebook.com/emcmorales GatubelaLA

      You’re going to get a Master’s in dueling???? Dueling and Science and Public Administration. Sounds like a dual Masters. Congrats!

    • Nathan

      Sophisticated…until the fact that you said you were from Arizona…what does that have to do with ANYTHING????

      • K Banker

        they’re all demographics. my location is important when i’m talking about school, but don’t want to reveal much more personal information on a random website.

        i’m getting one master of science degree (MS) while at the same time i’m getting a master of public administration (MPA), this is called recieving a “duel masters”

        • ra

          I think “no comment” is the nicest thing one could say here . . . but I just can’t help it: sophisticated people can spell, or at least spell check.

          The rest can remain unsaid.

        • http://www.facebook.com/emcmorales GatubelaLA

          Oh, sorry! I thought you were getting a “dual” masters. My mistake. Sorry :)

  • Eric

    Bernie is pretty smart in one respect; he’s getting paid a bunch of Google Ads money with all the hits the Daily Show fans are providing to this website.