Living in the Past

Living in the Past

New postby Media Rookie » Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:33 am

See here, Bernie's thoughts on the recent misguided NAACP resolution:

http://www.bernardgoldberg.com/living-in-the-past/

Let's not forget that the resolution was based on the fabrication of lies perpetrated by Rep. Carson during the healthcare vote protest.
"Well, today's eight-year-olds are tomorrow's teenagers. I say this calls for action and now. Nip it in the bud. First sign of youngsters going wrong, you've got to nip it in the bud." - Barney Fife
User avatar
Media Rookie
Media pundit
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Living in the Past

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Living in the Past

New postby 6079smithW » Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:40 am

Let's not forget that he didn't actually lie though, and that flim-clip didn't really prove anything.
User avatar
6079smithW
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1896
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: Living in the Past

New postby tim.ned@gmail.com » Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:48 pm

And let's keep in mind that for the Democrats and the NAACP it is politically imperative that the Tea Party be painted as racists.

I would never vote to proclaim the Democrats as racists even though Byrd was a former member of the KKK. But in reflection of Bill Clintons every effort to paint the "Early Byrd" as a young foolish politican, perhaps the Democrats are a racists organization. Certainly a racists government official is more dangerous than one hundred questionable signs at a tea party rally?
"Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other." Ronald Reagan
tim.ned@gmail.com
Media pundit
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:54 am

Re: Living in the Past

New postby Media Rookie » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:17 pm

6079smithW wrote:Let's not forget that he didn't actually lie though, and that flim-clip didn't really prove anything.


Who didn't lie????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5y17LKXB ... M3lq2amK9Y

And if he didn't lie where's the proof? Remember Andrew Breitbart offered $100,000 to anyone that can find one piece of evidence that that word was said. Proof from just one of the many camera crews, Jesse Jackson Jr's camphone, and cell phones all over. Also, Carson said that they were afraid of being stormed by the crowd, which they clearly gave them safe distances. Good grief, there are actually people that still believe that crap???
"Well, today's eight-year-olds are tomorrow's teenagers. I say this calls for action and now. Nip it in the bud. First sign of youngsters going wrong, you've got to nip it in the bud." - Barney Fife
User avatar
Media Rookie
Media pundit
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Living in the Past

New postby Cap'n Billy » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:52 pm

6079smithW wrote:Let's not forget that he didn't actually lie though, and that flim-clip didn't really prove anything.
He damn well did actually lie. So did everyone else who made such a claim. With all the various cameras, recording devices, etc., you don't think at least one of them would have caught it? And if they did, don't you think they would have claimed Breitbart's reward? Geez, Winston, even a Democrat flack like you ought to know better than that!
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." — C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Cap'n Billy
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Living in the Past

New postby 6079smithW » Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:48 am

Maybe, maybe not. I never liked the tendency of some folks on the left to accuse W of "lying" every time he was wrong about something, and it doesn't sound any smarter coming from the right.
User avatar
6079smithW
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1896
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: Living in the Past

New postby Cap'n Billy » Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:26 pm

Bush never, ever told a deliberate and malicious lie to try to discredit his fellow Americans like these people did. They made the accusation, and it was up to them to prove it. They couldn't, and yet to my knowledge they stick to their stories while the LSM gives them cover. Even giving them the benefit of the doubt that they misheard "Kill the Bill" for something else (hearing what they wanted to hear, no doubt), once they realized their mistake they should have manned up and admitted they were in error. Since they knew they were being protected by their aforementioned allies they saw no need to. Such are the people in the highest levels of this government.

This republic has been pretty resilient in the past, but I'm not sure it will be able to survive this Congress and Administration this time, even if we succeed in wresting power from them come November and 2012.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." — C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Cap'n Billy
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Living in the Past

New postby 6079smithW » Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:46 pm

Did these guys name names? No, they didn't. Not like what W, Frist and Hastert did to Terry Schiavo's husband, with such vicious glee.

Has the Tea Party been eviscerated by oft-repeated lies, the way the Republicans destroyed ACORN? Nope.

You're taking the side of the mean-spirited bunch who impeached Clinton, during a lame duck session after getting beat in an off-year election, for basically nothing.

I'm not sure why you are so despairing about the future of the country under leaders who are (1) trying to repair a broken health care system without a government takeover and (2) repair a financial system and economy that they have already rescued from the abyss once. I understand that you're hysterical, I'm just not following the "why".
User avatar
6079smithW
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1896
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: Living in the Past

New postby Cap'n Billy » Sat Jul 17, 2010 8:01 am

6079smithW wrote:I'm not sure why you are so despairing about the future of the country
Because it's populated by so many fools and ingrates like you. As for'hysteria,' fear not, I have the means to persevere regardless of the damage your precious fascists do to it save outright confiscation. If that happens, I've had a damn good ride for the past 7½ decades and they can't take that away from me. I doubt very much if you'll be able to say the same if you're (un)fortunate enough to live that long, and you will richly deserve the nasty, brutish and short life you get.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." — C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Cap'n Billy
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: Living in the Past

New postby 6079smithW » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:17 am

Yeah, well that really clears it up.

More fun facts: during the last 6 years of Clinton's Presidency, when the Republicans controlled the House, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform issued 1,052 subpoenas to investigate NONSENSE, like the "travel office," and "whitewater," and the Vince Foster "murder," and on, and on, and on.

That translates to an average of a politically-inspired subpoena every other day for six consecutive years, including weekends, holidays, and congressional recesses.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archiv ... 024779.php

Now we have a Congress that is actually working on IMPORTANT things, and you call it facism. :doh:
User avatar
6079smithW
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 1896
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: Living in the Past

New postby Jeffreydan » Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:26 pm

6079smithW wrote:Has the Tea Party been eviscerated by oft-repeated lies, the way the Republicans destroyed ACORN? Nope.

Is it right to intentionally, maliciously accuse people of something terrible with no proof? Nope. Have ACORN's critics shown proof of the organization's acting in a sleazy and illegal manner? Yep.
6079smithW wrote:You're taking the side of the mean-spirited bunch who impeached Clinton, during a lame duck session after getting beat in an off-year election, for basically nothing.
You lost this one long ago, but feel free to find a sexual harassment victim, who watched her harasser commit perjury against her in court, and discuss it with her.
6079smithW wrote:I'm not sure why you are so despairing about the future of the country under leaders who are (1) trying to repair a broken health care system without a government takeover and (2) repair a financial system and economy that they have already rescued from the abyss once. I understand that you're hysterical, I'm just not following the "why".
Want a real mystery? There are still people out there who believe that democrats in power are a bunch of altruistic, efficient, fiscally prudent people.

I know--WOW.
"I used to work as a parking attendant at Logan Airport in Boston...I parked jets. They had to let me go, though, because I kept locking the keys in them. One time I was on a 30-foot ladder trying to get in through the window with a coat hanger."
Jeffreydan
Media GOD!
 
Posts: 2850
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: San Diego, CA.


Return to Comment on Bernie's Columns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron