This is one of those good news bad news stories.
The other day, as the “Underpants Bomber” was pleading not guilty to the Christmas Day attempt to blow up Northwest flight 253, a group of American Muslims were demonstrating outside the federal courthouse in Detroit “to show the world,” as a newspaper report explained it, “that the terrorists don’t represent Islam.”
The demonstration was organized by a Dearborn, Michigan lawyer, a brave soul named Majed Moughni, who said, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the accused would-be bomber, “landed in the wrong place — he’s going to be met by the natives today. We’re going to take our religion back.”
As they marched outside the courthouse, the demonstrators chanted, “We are Americans.” Many of them carried American flags or signs with messages that said, “Not in the name of Islam.” In times of crisis, it’s important to state the obvious.
Moughni told reporters, “We are Americans, and we will never allow anyone to use Islam to commit terrorist acts. … This is serious. We’re putting our faces in front of the world. We’re telling the terrorists we’re Americans. If you want to kill Americans come kill us.”
All of this, of course, is the good news. Long overdue, in my view, but very good news nonetheless. The bad news is that only 50 people showed up for the demonstration.
According to one news report, Moughni said he was expecting hundreds, maybe thousands, to march outside the courthouse. Perhaps it was the cold that kept other Muslims away. Maybe they didn’t know about the demonstration. Maybe they couldn’t get away from their jobs. Or maybe there were only 50 or so Muslims in the Detroit area who weren’t afraid to speak out. Maybe only 50 cared enough to show up.
It is an oft repeated truism that that while most terrorists these days are Muslims, most Muslims aren’t terrorists. Most Muslims, we hope, deplore the violence committed in the name of their religion. But most Muslims, here in America and around the world, haven’t seen fit to stand up and say what those 50 demonstrators said in Detroit: We’re going to take our religion back. You are not doing this in our name. You bring shame on our religion and we are not with you.
I work with a young Muslim woman, very bright, very decent, who complained to me that official policy or no official policy, she and her brother are often “profiled” at airports because of how they look. “Take it up with the Muslim terrorists that have brought this on you,” I told her, “not with the TSA.”
But how? You can’t expect American Muslims to jump on airplanes, confront terrorists in the world’s hell-holes, and lecture them on common decency. But you can expect them to stand up and speak out, just as the Detroit demonstrators did. That’s why we need a Million Man (and Woman) Muslim March on Washington.
A few years ago I wrote a book called Crazies to the Left of Me Wimps to the Right, in which I asked, “Why should American Muslims march if they’re not blowing anybody up? Is this guilt by association? No. Muslims should march not to prove their innocence but to let the terrorists know that good Muslims will not support them – or even try to understand them – simply because they share the same religion. Muslims should march to isolate the radicals who kill in the name of Islam; to tell them that they are alone in their dark world; to make sure the fascist who pray to Allah know that they have no allies here in America.”
At the time, I told a friend about my idea and after he stopped laughing he said, “If you get a Five Muslim Man March, you’re lucky.”
Well, 50 showed up in Detroit. Okay, not five thousand or even five hundred, but 50 is more than five. It’s a start.
Yes, it’s true that much of the Arab world is an incubator for pathology where too many kids learn how to hate before they get out of kindergarten. Still, my idea isn’t as crazy as it sounds. Something like it has actually worked before – right here in America.
In Crazies, I wrote that, “In the bad days of the Old South, there really weren’t a lot of white people who went out looking for black people to lynch or beat up or run off the side of the road. In reality, there were very few terrorists in places like Alabama and Mississippi and Louisiana.
“But there were millions of other white folks in those places, who just didn’t want to get involved. These were the so-called ‘moderates’ – the ones who would never actually commit violence but just looked the other way.”
At some point, they stopped looking the other way. They understood that life could not go on the way it had been going. Many were tired of looking like bigots in the eyes of the rest of America. Maybe they realized their silence was acquiesence. And for whatever reason, whatever actual words they used, they sent out a message: No More, You are not doing this in OUR name. And that’s when America changed.
Just as our home-grown bigots needed to be isolated, so too do today’s terrorists. Anyone who wants to play it “safe” and not get involved, anyone who wants to simply “look the other way” is part of the problem. A big part. That’s why we should be encouraged by that little demonstration in Detroit the other day. And it’s why we need more of them. Lot’s more. With lots more brave Muslims shouting — Not in Our Name.
This is totally what I am trying to do
If your expecting your moderate muslims to support western liberalism your missing the point.Islam has no problem benifitting from the USA but has a big problem supporting it.Modern muslims live off west and they know it .There isnt enough support in the koran itself to sustain opposition to the extremes it inflames and most muslims cant justify embracing the freedom we share in the west with each other ,they can only justify the selfish freedom they get here to be muslim and hate us for what we truly stand for
Bernie, I wish you could keep your negative thoughts about Sarah Palin to yourself. To put someone down that IS coming against our President makes you off the wall. WHAT side are you on? Concerns are many, Obama THE muslim is doing his best to bankrupt us, get your head screwed on right, because Obama;s isn’t. Bernie, your afraid of a Women being in a high office, and don’t judge someone by how they talk etc.. And your political correctness is coming through loud and clear. So, it separates you from the Tea Party People. Remember the Constitution ? stick to it…
Any Muslim that does not point a finger at a known terrorist is a contributor to the crimes these terrorists commit. If all Muslims would identify the criminals, they would not have a place to hide. Look at them. They hide their faces. If they are right and just, why do they hide. Could it be that they do not really believe in what they do and do not want others to know what they are.
Bernie, I like your comments on the O’Reilly factor, and that’s why I write this note. Yesterday, you commented about the “analyst” you expect Gov. Sarah Palin to be on FOX. Now, come on; you really expect the Governor, and to many the future President of the US, to be “informative” as you put it, as Karl Rove or Dick Morris?
Are they, or you for that matter, running for President, or have any chance of ever becoming one? Do any of you have a six-month old FB page with 1.2 million supporters? Get real.
Governor Palin is there to be delivering HER message and to increase the audience for FOX, period. No one (except maybe you, and the rest of the talking heads in all “media”) expects her to get down to your level of “analysis” (with “statistics” and “quotations” and “references” etc) to make and document “insiders’s points”.
She’s there to deliver a simple message: the Obama administration is a failure, and its radical leftwing policies are a disaster for this country. And at the same time, to tell the American people, in simple terms and in a very focused manner, that she stands for God, Liberty, Family, and free markets.
I hope that this simple message, even talking heads with deep insider thoughts, can get.
Gregg,
I liked Bernie’s comments on Bill O’Reilly last as well, but for different reasons. Sarah Palin was hired as a Fox News Analyst, not to use the network as a platform for her agenda. Bill even said that many factor viewers want her to stop campaigning and tell everyone what she thinks and why she thinks it. How can Sarah Palin possibly handle being President of the United States, if she can’t articulate on a wide variety of important issues? I wouldn’t vote for her. I don’t want Fox News to become “The Sarah Palin campaign network” because that’s just as bad as what Matthews/Olbermann did with Obama over at MSNBC. That’s not good for the country, it will tear us apart.
i cannot be as blunt as i would like (pertaining to the earthquake in haiti), but BILL’S questions 1-14-2010 were what i think are as important as the concern for the fate of the people in haiti if not more so.without rambling on,i would really like to think i care but at the same time i don’t want one penny of my taxes going to this corrupt 1/2 island! i only wonder how many other people fell the same and can’t possibly admit to it?
Fear of speaking out against the terrorists is a factor even here in the United States. Very sad, isn’t it?
Totally agree Bernie. Speaking of your book “Crazies to the Left of Me, Whimps to the Right”, I think that people need to read the section about “understanding” the terrorists, and especially your discussion with the black woman at whatever function you were attending. That book was a great read. Keep up the good work!
Stephen
Excellent column. Unfortunately, I agree that this is long overdue. It was my belief that immediately following 9-11, President George W. Bush should have made a clear call to Muslim Americans to stand up for the United States, and for all other Americans to join with them. In my opinion, his inability to effectively communicate with, and rally the people of this nation to stand together was his biggest failure as President.
Bernie, What Christian country has killed more people, then all the Muslim countries combined? Think about it…
Another stupid post. At least you’re consistent.
Think about what?
Wil, congratulations on almost using perfect English and spelling this time.
You evidently didn’t “think about it” when posing the question, and you certainly were vague about it. Were you suggesting that the Union was evil, because of the huge number of Civil War deaths?
Or were you talking about the millions of deaths brought on as a result of abortion becoming legal?
In the event you decide to stay with the discussion, please try to be more specific next time.
Please don’t feed the troll.
Hey Wil!
Look!
There’s something shiny behind you!
It wants to be your friend!
Now go away and spend time with your shiny thing, Wil…grown-ups are talking now.
Think about what? Think about how ridiculous your straw man argument is?
Wil, are you suggesting that the United States is an evil nation? Just curious…
In the last 10 years, what country has killed more people the all the Muslim countries combined? And BTW, all the rest of the world too!
People, rather then an insult, how about an answer!
It’s because we fight to give freedom to others. Have we taken over another country since Texas? You don’t get this?
Well braniac since you know… By the way, I would like to see some supported evidence like actual research from something other than a conservative or liberal think tank. If you can do that for me, I guarantee it isn’t the United States of America.
Wil, if it is the United States, please provide proof of this. I’d be interested in seeing this.
EXCELLENT column, Bernie. A pleasure to read, as always.
I’m sure that before too long, this column will be picked up and reprinted in the Palestinian media, al-Jaeezra and newspapers in Jordan, Saudia Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and the rest of the Arab world.
Guess I shouldn’t hold my breath, eh?
Bernie,
You make a lot of sense in this article. My own fear is muslims will wait too late, something horrible here in America will happen and there will be real backlash, real injury to Muslims for no other reason than being Muslim. Why? Because they may have been part of the community from which the terrorists came; they MAY have known about it or heard about it, and said nothing, because they were either afraid or supportive of the terrorists. Either way they may have known and said nothing and were guilty by association. If innocent Muslims don’t become proactive in protests and actually REPORTING terrorist plans and exposing them they’re going to suffer, because there’s only so much American’s will take and remain content to let our moron officials take care of this.
Regarding the South, you have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m a southern who went to Yale and lived for 15 years in Connecticut. It is clear to me presently that the racial bigotry is more palpable and apparent in the North, and the fact that almost all the racial unrest and race violence has been in the North and California and not the south attests to that truth. Bigotry in the south was much less than in the North in the antebellum south. Northerners knew virtually nothing of black, because their laws forbade them to live there, vote or own property. Some states, like Massachusetts had laws on their books that only let blacks visit there for a few weeks. Breaking those laws resulted in severe punishments. The collection of letters back home from northern soldiers having finally actually encountered blacks in the south represents the largest collection of racist, eugenicist commentary in history until the Nazi/Progressive age. Lincoln’s own vision was extradition, NOT living together. And he had no compunction about extradition to the caribbean, where slavery was cruel and resulted in almost certain death. To call the south bigoted and remain mute about the rest of the country is to simply parrot Federal propaganda, for the stereotyping of the south as the bastion of blgotry is one of the ways northerners salve their conscience about causing an unconstitutional, brutal all out war that resulted in the deaths of almost half a million men and destroyed the rights of the states and establishing the omnipotent, consolidated Empire from what was once a peaceful, trading Republic. We suffer from the consequences of that travesty today, all of us enslaved by a confiscatory, rapacious, central planning, consolidated state which is despotic at home and aggressive abroad.
50. 50 people.
A million? A thousand? I’d like to see that.
I like your thinking. Having said that, however, I do have to agree with – or at least acknowledge – Dan’s point: Good Muslims who speak out against the terrorist types may be frightened to do so for fear of retaliation. I think of the Crusades in Europe… if we kill enough of the non Christians then the others will just cave. If the terrorist/radical Muslims kill enough of the level headed Muslims then they (non terrorists) may just cave and stop protesting what’s being done in the name of Allah.
Helen Thomas says to John Brennan and Janet Napolitano: “You don’t give the motivation for why they want to do us harm”. Same old same old: can’t we all just get along? This is just one more reminder that this cultural chasm is crisscrossed mostly by bridges to nowhere. Your question “but how?” – answered by a call to moderate American Muslims to march by the million may be monumental. Why not? Fear (as your first commenter mentioned), or complicity (hope not), are possible explanations. A 50 people march is one small step for moderate Islam. Maybe a giant leap will follow. Sending KSM et al to Jihad Rehab isn’t going to work.
In the bad days of the Old South those “whites”, who kept under the radar, would have suffered much of the same pain from the KKK, etc. and they knew it, so they opted out and stayed “safe”. Whites that protested racism were called “n—-r” lovers.
Everyone is missing the point. The “Underpants Bomber” didn’t get a copy of the passenger list to see if there were any Muslims on flight 253; he didn’t care. It’s really very simple. It’s them vs. the rest of the whole world. These suicide/homicide bombers have blown up place after place, and the people there don’t rally to stop it. If Al Quida is bombing hundreds and thousands of their own people every year, and the victims don’t do anything, you are in dreamland if you think these American Muslims will march anywhere, even when the weather is nice for marches.
Bernie,
I think you’re correct in the thought that most Muslims won’t want to get involved, but it goes deeper than just that. I think they truly believe that they will be targeted for death if they speak out, because they’ll be seen as siding with the “infidels.” And it’s my opinion that, for many, a fear of death trumps even a desire for justice.
Your idea is laudable, but probably not workable. Those 50 people in Detroit may now find themselves on a “watch list” of their own that has nothing to do with the TSA. And that’s exactly why we need to fight radical Islam and win – nobody should be allowed to take another’s life, for any reason other than self-defense, period. And those who kill in the name of their god are only looking for an excuse to commit evil. I say to them, drop the pretense.
Another good column, Bernie, I agree totally that Muslims have to get involved to take back their religion from extremists, but unfortunately Dan is right. See the attached column: http://www.freep.com/article/20100112/NEWS05/100112009/1322/Muslim-rally-organizer-claims-death-threats I don’t know what the answer will be here.