8 Comments
Aug 21, 2023Liked by John A. Daly

Very well put John. an excellent summation!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks.

Expand full comment

With Trump not showing up, there's a good chance none of Trump's disciples will bother watching the debate. Frankly, other than some political news junkies, it's hard to imagine many, if any, other folks will be tuning in. Unless someone gets off a one-liner that makes the rounds the next day, the debate will be forgotten by next week, unfortunately.

Expand full comment
author

>>With Trump not showing up, there's a good chance none of Trump's disciples will bother watching the debate.

Yeah, I mentioned that in last week's No BS Zone, and probably should have included it in this piece. It's an important point.

Expand full comment

Twice impeached- given today’s new news - that label is now contrived and without weight. Guilt by political argument is not guilt.

Expand full comment
author

>>that label is now contrived and without weight.

He was literally impeached twice. Facts don't care about your feelings.

>>Guilt by political argument is not guilt.

Neither trying to use congressionally-approved defense funding to extort a foreign ally for political dirt, nor causing an insurrection at the Capitol through two months of lies, are political arguments. Facts don't care about your feelings.

Expand full comment

Your opinion, like the others. The new indictments don’t even indicate insurrection because it wasn’t. I suggest you drop that from your lexicon because it’s meaningless. And I suggest you follow some news given your previous comments indicate that you don’t. Don’t be one of the 4 out the 10 that don’t know what is going on.

Expand full comment
author
Aug 20, 2023·edited Aug 21, 2023Author

>>Your opinion, like the others.

It's an opinion that Trump was impeached twice? It's an opinion that the articles of impeachment spelled out the case for those impeachments? No. These are facts, and facts don't care about your feelings — even feelings as tender as yours.

>>The new indictments don’t even indicate insurrection because it wasn’t.

Uh, Thomas... The only indictment that has anything to do with January 6 is in regard to what led up to that day, not the actual insurrection. At some point, you should try reading some of this stuff.

>>I suggest you drop that from your lexicon because it’s meaningless.

No thanks. I'll stick with facts, while you focus exclusively on your feelings.

>>And I suggest you follow some news

Thomas, Steve Bannon's podcast isn't "news." Neither are Mike Lindell's YouTube musings. Hopefully you'll figure that out one day, but I'm not holding my breath.

>>Don’t be one of the 4 out the 10 that don’t know what is going on.

Lol. Thomas, you don't even know what crimes Trump's being charged with. Your regard for actual news is as non-existent as your respect for the Constitution and rule of law.

Expand full comment